I think Pilot13 meant he was not going to get a 360...? Well you could always wait and get the PS3 version
Yeah, I got that. I was imitating his spacky, double negative speak, to point out he should get one; if he wants to play it so much... but, yeah, he could wait for a PS3 instead.
I think we'll see this on the Revolution as well. Naka and Iwata are best friends or something. Naka has publicly stated that he wants specific Sega franchises to stay on specific consoles and Sonic has always done well on the Nintendo platforms.
If this Sonic doesn't make it to the Revolution, I'm going to guess that Naka'll get something else Sonic-related and exclusive to make up for it.
Those shots look really good :) I can see why SPOnG was so excited about it at E3, can't wait to see some videos of it running.
it is incredible in motion... the whol ecollection of sega footage was probably the most excitign part of the whole show... besides that whole being at E3 thing... which was pretty exciting in general.
also discovering on the last day that i was able to wave about my press pass and skip lines! if only I had known sooner... could have been much more productive. cest la vie! (sp?)
Basically, I'm going to Uni in a few weeks, I'm not taking a TV because I'm not paying for a licence fee so I won't be able to play any consoles. I could buy a 360/ps3, but I won't have anything to display it. Unless you know of anyway to joy rigg a Powerbook G4 to work as a TV output.
Unless you know of anyway to joy rigg a Powerbook G4 to work as a TV output.
im not real big up on the whole MAC thing in recent years but i do believe pc lap tops have video capture devices available via the expansion slots... if they make a similar item for a mac lap top then you could in theory use that for your gamming
infact i know they make usb and firewire video input devices... like... this
wont be the best quality vid option but it certainly better than not playign at all... now quick... go preorder :) ____
Or just don't buy a TV licence and then if the nasty TV licence man comes around you blame all the other people in the house/flat saying 'I though you where sorting it out'. As you only need one TV licence per flat/house and you normally share the bill between everyone in the flat/house. Then you just go out an buy one or they will fine ya.
Or get a TV and not a aerial, and tell the licence man you only play games and you never watch TV, look no aerial. You only need a licence if you watch terrestrial TV, not if you own a TV.
Or get a TV and not a aerial, and tell the licence man you only play games and you never watch TV, look no aerial. You only need a licence if you watch terrestrial TV, not if you own a TV.
If you use a TV or any other device to receive or record TV programmes (for example, a VCR, set-top box, DVD recorder or PC with a broadcast card) - you need a TV Licence. You are required by law to have one.
Also regarding only one license for the house;
If you are going to be sharing a house, a separate tenancy agreement would normally mean your room is classified a separately occupied place. In this case, if you have a TV in your room, you will need your own TV Licence.
However, if there is only one TV in a communal area, then only one TV Licence is required. Similarly, if your house can be treated as one place shared by all, then only one TV Licence is required - a joint tenancy agreement would normally indicate that there is only one separately occupied place.
So basically, if you have a TV or a device capable of receiving broadcast television transmissions (includes a satellite receiver or PC with a capture card) you need a license.
231 comments
:(