SEGA Sammy Posts Profit

> News Comments > SPOnG Comments Index

Topic started: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 19:58
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Page:«12
Naouruki
Joined 3 Aug 2005
12 comments
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 19:58
So, towing the industry's bullshit line now as well, are we, Spong?

Thsi was the once the only news site that actually reported the Sa**my takeover for what it is and was - a hostile takeover done behind closed doors after SEGA Enterprises rejected their numerous overtures, with a not-so-insignifiant dash of personal vendetta and plain bloodthiristiness on the part of Satan-ome. Thsi was the only news site that actually reported as if it gave a damn that SEGA was literally raped behind closed doors by CSK and Sa**y with NOTHING to say about it. While every single site and mag on the planet showed its true bias towards Nintendo, house of Miyamoto's boresome-to-tears kid-friendly repitition, when RARE left and acted as thoughit were the end of the world, they all ingored when SEGA was literally raped, castrated and dissolved to be part of a 'holding company' with nothign to say about it. Nobody else blinked an eye when SEGA's corporate board was with such hostility dumped and replaced by Sa**y Yakuza-tied thugs, nor when the mastermind that is Mizuguchi-san left among others.

All the ignorant f**katrded webistes and 'gamers' out there instead cooed - with zero basis - about how this was helping SEGA. How it was a good thing. How SEGA would be 'saved'. Zero consideration for the very creators who made the very company we loved so much and who so resented the new hostile environment. Zero consideration for the fact that Satan-ome himself stated, this was a hostile takeover with view only of - like a f**king leech - using the SEGA name to shift Sa**my s**t taht otherwise would not shift - and of course, to rape SEGA's considerable arcade floorspace landscape worldwide with pachinko .
'Remember, it wasn’t so long ago that it looked as if the legendary hard and software house might disappear altogether. '

What moronic, utterly sick-in-mind deviant wrote this inaccurate bullshit? Do you, Spong, forget so easily how just prior to SEGA being raped by CSK, how you yourself reported that SEGA had that very fiscal year of 2003 turned a massive ***PROFIT**? Home sales were at a loss as they still are under Satan-ome but were regardless gradually increasing - and SEGA Toys and SEGA's aracde sector mroe than made up for the shortfall and TURNED SEGA ITS FIRST ANNUAL PROFIT IN YEARS AND YEARS. This was prior to Satan-ome using the dirty trick of seducing CSK behind closed doors, of which he later boasted - ' They rejected us at first, but we knew one way or the other we would get them ' and buying out the majority stock option. This was prior to that f**king green logo having any place in SEGA's existence - and this was during SEGA's very REJECTION of Sa**my *NUMEROUS* times.

So Tell me, Spong, how the f**k is it you dare say that without Sa**y, SEGA was actually clsoe to disappearing off the face of the earth? It is my gebuine and true belief that whoever wrote that needs to literally be gagged and shot in the head. After all, f**kwitted journos like this who write up completel bullshit are the ones who go on to support bigger and bloodier lies for genocidal regimes like that of Bush and Balir.

SEGA knew Sa**y was nothing more than a leech looking to rape its resources, dissolve its studios and use its name as a badge to shift s**t. Never was SEGA - corporate board and game house heads and designers alike - so openly hostile of any merger offer. There was more than good reaosn for this. Yet you, Spong, along with the thousand sof other moronic and ignorant 'gamers; out there, actually believe yourself to be above them in understanding what is better for SEGA? Who the f**k do you people think you are?

The lone articale on the internet that actually stated the takeover for what it was - utterly hostile and in S**my's, not SEGA's interets of survival, was Idle Thumbs - ***n00b weblink removed*** ALong with the honest news at Spong. But you morons have gone and f**ked that over now as well, haven't you?

'SEGA' now finding itself in a secure position? Do you catre at all to post the fact that SEGA no longer exists - and is only a badge and name/trademark used by a holding company fully owned by Satan-ome?


WHy I am so feverish to the point that I am so utterly furious about the opne lies and way in which Sa**y is being portrayed as SEGA's saviour when SEGA never needed one and was already well on its way to recovery? Because the kind of ignorant yet self-righteous people who ignore blatant fact - along with hostile open statements from Satan-ome himself, and make out a hostile takeover and rape of a legendary game house to be everything it is not - are the very same people who lie and deceice and are deceived on a garnder scale - those who will turn a blind eye to the open hostile comments of wiping out entire populations in Fallujah by their leaders - those who will actually act as if, despite its entire basis being a dirty lie, the invasion and very literal rape of Iraq's women, children and men was and is , regardless, a 'Good Thing' TM.

Ignorance is the most vile thing inthe entire world. Spong, you have disgusted me as I thought I never would be.
supadupagama
Joined 14 Jul 2005
14 comments
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 21:23
You're wrong Naouruki. Spong aren't saying they approve of the hostile takeover that might've killed off it's creative talent in the console videogames devision. No one that knows approves of it.

That said, your statement is wrong, SEGA were running a loss for many many years, they still had a debt after the late Isao Okawa (former president of SEGA, RIP) donated $1.281 billion of his own assets to SEGA the year before he died in 2001.

If no one had reinforced SEGA's cashflow in the next 5 years they very likely would have gone under, even with small profits, simply because they have to pay rent over debts. I mean, jeez man chill, at least now you know they'll be around for a long long time.
Dreadknux
Joined 14 Jul 2004
700 comments
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 21:29
As one of SEGA's most ardent fans, it's my duty to give you this message:

Shut the hell up.

Yes, SEGA developers left in a huff. Yes, it was a hostile takeover, and yes it was all doomed and blah blah blah. But those SEGA devs had issues with the company BEFORE the takeover. Sammy has pretty much added zero complications to SEGA, aside from riding the waves of their brand name to shift their own titles and pachinko, as you say.

Tell me exactly, how is SEGA being 'run' by Sammy any bloody different from SEGA being 'run' by CSK? Apart from the drama that has surrounded the takeover I mean - welcome to the Internet, where everyone's a f**king critic and think they can make better business decisions than the companies themselves.

Sammy's involvement - aside from the aforementioned releasing pachinkos under SEGA's name - amounts to funding SEGA projects. That's it. OMFG, destruction!!11!one! And without the cash, you have no games do you?

Now don't take this the wrong way - I was also of the opinion that Sammy's takeover would provide serious problems for SEGA. But unless you can prove somehow that Sammy had a direct influence on the development of Sonic Heroes, Spikeout and other recent 'tame' SEGA releases, Sammy have done nothing really but financial stability. And the odd cheeky pachinko release. You're less of a fan and more of a fecking idiot.
Joji
Joined 12 Mar 2004
3960 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 01:04
Naouruki, you need to chill. We know Sammy took over Sega but none of us agree with it, but Sega were in trouble. While I would have liked to see someone else take Sega over it wasn't to be.

True a lot of SS games have been lacking but I pray they'll bounce back to good form in time. Games like Feel The Magic it's upcoming sequel and Sonic DS seem to be looking good. As for their hom consoles effort what this space, but I hear more Outrun will be on the way besides more of their back catalogue.

Naouruki
Joined 3 Aug 2005
12 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 01:10
The f**king idiot is none other than you, Svend.

The diference in CSK being a parent company and in Sa**y owning SEGA? Every possible one imaginable. One a mere parent company, the other a hostile leech that took over the company despite SEGA rejecting it so many times, going on to then dissolve SEGA forever and make it a mere brand name of their holding company - on whose board there are zero SEGA execs. Not to mention dissolving every single studio and treating studio heads and execs like dirt.

Mizuguchi-sdan et al left upon Sa**y's takeover - had they had issue with the studio mergers before within SEGA why not have left then? Don't try to play that bullshit, and for that matter, learn to spell f**king f**king correctly.

Sa**y's involvement and meddling with SEGA has already become apparent and will be moreso once the next gen hits. Already it is pushing SEGA towards becoming the next Take Two and towards Western bland and the brainless genre of games. Only proven money milking franchises have been given any real attention, budget and for that matetr release. Franchises whored otu to be what they are not - Shenmue Onlie - it all amounts to rape . Even the most f**king moronic of morons will be forced to admit that SEGA is now constricted in not being able to do what it as a company wants - everything must go through the exec board, headed solely - 100% - by the Sa**y Yakuza clan.

Ardent SEGA fans you lot? Full of bullshit more like it. 90% of the f**kers who make the claim have zero knowledge of the company or its history - let alone that, these are the very same people who dictehd the DC in droves along with its network in droves and don't even realise that Sonic Team has kept the servers for PSO alive even until now for its loyal fans - which clearly hacks like you lot are not. F**k off, and suck off - Satan-ome, that is.
Naouruki
Joined 3 Aug 2005
12 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 01:14
Strongly diagreed Joji. it is well and clear that SEGA did not NEED to be taken over. They were courting offers for mergers - there is a HUGE, colossal, difference.

You make it look as though SEGA was shopping itself about. False, utterly. SEGA was not in 'trouble' the way of Acclaim, Atari et al before and after it - it may have had to cut down on some of its traditional ways but these were paying off and it was turnign a profit that would no doubt increase as time passed.
Absinthe-Review.net
Joined 18 Jun 2004
122 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 03:28
While I think Naouruki may have overdone it somewhat, he does have valid points. And as everyone knows, There were MANY developers interested in a partnership with Sega. hell, Sega even turned-down a handful of developers, so how bad do you think it really could've been if they could afford to casually dismiss massive gaming conglomerates? If things started going downhill again, Sega would've had plenty of options. Who would really turn down access to decades of hit franchises, legendary icons, and endless possibilities for sequels and remakes (most of which would be guaranteed sellers)? Moreover, the point is that SEGA would've been the one to choose.

Another point Naouruki mentioned was how the media destroyed Sega. And they DID. It didn't matter what game site or game mag you looked at...the underlying theme was always "just wait for PS2". This singlehandedly destroyed the DC. Sega had a massive, stylish marketing campaign that should've worked wonders had it not been for every game mag sticking in 18 f**king pages about the latest reasons why PS2 was better than DC. Fast forward to just prior to Sammy taking Sega hostage. New editorials were springing-up every 15 minutes about how the end is near for Sega. Do you know what a SINGLE negative outlook from an industry leader does to a company's STOCK VALUE? The plummeting stock of course lead to even more negative reports and it bacame a vicious cycle, a trap if you will.

Just prior and shortly after the takeover, there were Sammy reps shooting cocky quotes to media sources left and right about their little accomplishment. This also lead to the resignation of many irreplaceable veteran Sega staff members, out of pure disgust, no less. Sammy almost immediately made it clear that Shenmue III, hardcore fans' most anticipated game, was out of the question, because it was not likely to turn a profit (although to their credit, it seems as if they're allowing it for a future project now). Sammy DOES have control of Sega, there's no denying it.

Sadly, this is all in the past, and we can do nothing but hope for an increasingly profitable future and cross our fingers that Sammy will allow Sega to operate more independantly as time goes on...
BustyKrusty
Joined 2 Apr 2005
77 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:01
Namco merger would have been ideal.Now with Sammy they,re at least secure from a financial standpoint and from fellas such as EA.See what's happening to Ubisoft,that'd be much worse i think.

Yes,forced mergers suck,cause control loss and execs departures are always associated with it but i doubt Sega's best development studios,well known franchises,and creativity will vanish because of this sad shift.3 yrs ago and now they said to aim to grow a major publisher and Sammy definitely wants that too.

The_Moss
Joined 20 May 2004
33 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:26
Nobody, not even the article, is saying that Sammy's takeover was a good thing. It's happened though, and the only question now is, do you want to watch the company that SEGA now is dwindle and die or succeed?

Lots of people left, but as long as the likes of Nagoshi, Naka and Suzuki are still there, do you want to see it sink without a trace?

Dreadknux
Joined 14 Jul 2004
700 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:52
The f**king idiot is none other than you, Svend.

You know, you should pull that stick out of your butt, I wasn't handing you any malice. But blimey you don't half ramble.

Mizuguchi-sdan et al left upon Sa**y's takeover - had they had issue with the studio mergers before within SEGA why not have left then?

You're a funny little boy.

September - October 2003: SEGA in talks with Namco and Sammy for mergers. Both fall through.

October 1st 2003: SEGA restructures its development studios. With no help from Sammy. No intervention. They do it on their own. They figure they can survive on their own, so to compensate for potential losses, they decide to fold most of their studios and merge them together - for example, UGA with SONICTEAM.

October 7th 2003: Tetsuya Mizuguchi leaves SEGA. The UGA/SONICTEAM merge is confirmed as the sole reason for his leaving.

May 18th 2004: Sammy finally ready to take over SEGA. Once they do some time later, they do a further restructuring of the development studios.

Here's a timeline for you to easily understand. Before you go preaching 'research' to a journalist and SEGA fan, I advise you not to trust everything that is written on WIKIPEDIA.

Pleb.

learn to spell f**king f**king correctly.

A. "Fecking" is a real word. Learn English (or Irish slang, if you will. Not that I'm Irish).

B. Again, if you're going to comment on my spelling (incorrectly), you should know how to spell yourself. You even mispelled "Shenmue Online", you turd.

Franchises whored otu to be what they are not - Shenmue Onlie - it all amounts to rape.

Rape is a bit strong - I agree with you that the last thing I wanted was a "Matrix - I mean, Shenmue - Online", as Shenmue (and II) is one of my favourite games. But we don't even know if it will play any good. Not that I have high hopes or anything - as far as I'm aware, AM2 aren't even involved all that much in this one - and although I would rather they just left it at Shenmue II (seeings as they currently cannot afford a third instalment), there are some SEGA fans that would enjoy seeing Shenmue again. Of course, they'd have to be a little bit "weird" in the head, but hey.

Even the most f**king moronic of morons will be forced to admit that SEGA is now constricted in not being able to do what it as a company wants - everything must go through the exec board, headed solely - 100% - by the Sa**y Yakuza clan.

If you're a company that is 100% funding the projects of another, of course you're going to know what it's going to be spent on. And whether it will get any return. Although to make myself sound less like a Sammy fan (ugh! A Sammy fan I am most indeed not), I remember an interview with Yuji Naka (I believe) a while ago mentioning that it's not too much hassle getting projects by Sammy. He said that it basically amounts to Sammy just knowing where the money is going - they apparently give the go ahead to all of SEGA's projects (except for Shenmue III it would appear, but with good reason; it'd kill both companies if it didn't sell). It's pissing me off, because I can't find the damn interview anywhere now (I believe it was on my website, but that's offline, which helps...)

90% of the f**kers who make the claim have zero knowledge of the company or its history

Says the person who goes by Wikipedia as a SEGA history bible. =P

these are the very same people who dictehd the DC in droves along with its network in droves and don't even realise that Sonic Team has kept the servers for PSO alive even until now for its loyal fans

Yes, I probably knew better than you about the presence of PSO's servers, since if nothing else I'm a bigger Sonic Team fan than a SEGA one. And my Saturn, Dreamcast, Mega Drive/Mega CD and Game Gear are sitting pretty opposite the room from me, thanks. I do think you're right that some fans can be hypocritical though, in that they complain that SEGA no longer make consoles, yet they didn't buy any of their product when they had the chance. Ticks me off.
Naouruki
Joined 3 Aug 2005
12 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:07
1. Where you pulled Wikipedia from can be nowhere else than your arse. What a laughably pathwtic comment, further pathetically tried to pass on as fact by saying ' so says'. Should you decide to accuse of inaccuracy and lack of research , you may not want to commit the absolute most pathetic and disgusting offense of making up pure and utter lies, further attempted to be cemented as fact.

Further to that ; your little 'timeline. Sa**y officially completed the takeover in 2004 - but set this in motion with its majority stock option with view of the buyout IN LATE 2003. It was AFTER THIS - and should you doubt this, fu**wit, refer to Spong's own archives and those of any other news source at the time - that Mizuguchi-san et al left and that an insider at SEGA reported to Reuters that it wa slikely most of the staff were nto comfortable in the new evironment.

Further to point out your utter lack of disregard for fact and contentness with making up utter BS whilst accusing of the very same - SEGA's merging of various studios well predated Mizuguchi-san's departure as well as that of other staff. he - and they - did not leave upon SEGA's restructuring in 2003. They left upon Sa**y's acquisition of the majority stock option later in the year. This, of course, you are unaware of and will chosoe to ignore, because you are, after all, an utter hack and a disgrace to someone who claims they have actually followed what has been happening to SEGA since then.


2. " If you're a company that is 100% funding the projects of another, of course you're going to know what it's going to be spent on. "

Again, this highlights your utter and complete lack of any real knowledge and awareness of SEGA's situation. Sa**y is not funding any projects of 'another company'. That 'other company ' - and be careful to get this through your bloody cranium this time - for every single intent and purpose - no longer exists. You try to spout BS as if Mizuguchi-san and the others left when SEGA restructured internally itself, but fail to mention or realise that it was Satan-ome who completely dissolved the studios save Sonikku Team - and far more importantly **DISSOLVED SEGA CORPORATION** itself and made it mere brand name of the newly formed holding company in which the only figment of SEGA that remained was its name and its assets.


You may indeed have your SEGE consoles and Naka-san's games sitting pretty and enjoyed as they should be, but you, Svend, are a rambling, uninformed, BS-spouting moronic fool.

Should my words be too strong for any fools like yourself, B-Lo puts it across just as well in a method that far more pities the fool like you.



Naouruki
Joined 3 Aug 2005
12 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:29
1. Where you pulled Wikipedia from can be nowhere else than your arse. What a laughably pathetic comment, further pathetically tried to pass on as fact by saying ' so says'. Should you decide to accuse of inaccuracy and lack of research , you may not want to commit the absolute most pathetic and disgusting offense of making up pure and utter lies, further attempted to be cemented as fact.

Further to that ; your little 'timeline. Sa**y officially completed the takeover in 2004 - but set this in motion with its majority stock option with view of the buyout IN LATE 2003. It was AFTER THIS - and should you doubt this, fu**wit, refer to Spong's own archives and those of any other news source at the time - that Mizuguchi-san et al left and that an insider at SEGA reported to Reuters that it was likely most of the staff were not happy in the new evironment.

Further to point out your utter lack of disregard for fact and contentment with making up utter BS whilst accusing of the very same - SEGA's merging of various studios well predated Mizuguchi-san's departure as well as that of other staff. He - and they - did not leave upon SEGA's restructuring in 2003. They left upon Sa**y's acquisition of the majority stock option later in the year. This, of course, you are unaware of and will chosoe to ignore, because you are, after all, an utter hack and a disgrace to someone who claims they have actually followed what has been happening to SEGA since then.


2. " If you're a company that is 100% funding the projects of another, of course you're going to know what it's going to be spent on. "

Again, this highlights your utter and complete lack of any real knowledge and awareness of SEGA's situation. Sa**y is not funding any projects of 'another company'. That 'other company ' - and be careful to get this through your bloody cranium this time - for every single intent and purpose - no longer exists. You try to spout BS as if Mizuguchi-san and the others left when SEGA restructured internally itself, but fail to mention or realise that it was Satan-ome who completely dissolved the studios save Sonikku Team - and far more importantly **DISSOLVED SEGA CORPORATION** itself and made it mere brand name of the newly formed holding company in which the only figment of SEGA that remained was its name and its assets.


You may indeed have your SEGE consoles and Naka-san's games sitting pretty and enjoyed as they should be, but you, Svend, are a rambling, uninformed, BS-spouting moronic fool.



(Edit: edited post mistakenly posted as new minus grammatical errors courtesy of overnight shift nesring its end sans coffee)
Rumpy Stumpy
Joined 4 Aug 2005
2 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:00
I had to register just to tell you to get over yourself and what a t**t I think you are.

Bottom line is, if there were enough loyal fans and SEGA new how to run a business properly, a takeover, hostile or otherwise wouldn't have been required.

So stop going on like your the only SEGA fan (although if they are all like you, no wonder they got themselves in to trouble) and just be happy Sammy saved their sorry arse.
config
Joined 3 Sep 1999
2088 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:10
Rumpy Stumpy wrote:
I had to register just to tell you to get over yourself and what a t**t I think you are.

Bottom line is, if there were enough loyal fans and SEGA new how to run a business properly, a takeover, hostile or otherwise wouldn't have been required.

So stop going on like your the only SEGA fan (although if they are all like you, no wonder they got themselves in to trouble) and just be happy Sammy saved their sorry arse.


Hello Rumpy (It's okay to call you Rumpy, isn't it?), and welcome to SPOnG. Thanks for registering. You and all the other participants in the thread have so far confirmed that Naouruki is in fact a cretinous t**t.
Rumpy Stumpy
Joined 4 Aug 2005
2 comments
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:15
Hello config,

Yes you can call me Rumpy. I was meaning to sign up for a while and I won't just be flaming people on the forums for the sake of it. (i do that on eurogamer - clicky bunch of gits)

Have a good day as some people say.
<< Prev12

Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.